Having red Tin Tin The Shooting Star, and having seen two
Charles Chaplin silent movies, The Dictator and Pay Day, I notice many
differences in the way I interpret and even relate to the story depending on
the medium, and the role that words and imagery play.
First of all I believe that the nature of the medium
modifies my experience of the story deeply.
Having red since
young comic strips, and specially Tin Tin, the story is for me more relatable,
I could when younger but still can now put myself in the story and be in the
location with the character. I think I can attribute this to the fact that
since it’s a comic strip and that even thought it has a clear linear story line;
the viewer can jump around the dialogues and illustrations, since the time is
not pre determined, I sometimes find myself first reading the last conversation
to then be curios about why is that conversation so and read the beginning
after, creating many possibilities of wondering and theories in my mind that I
could relate to, that not necessarily the writer was thing off. For example, in
Tin Tin The Shooting Star, when the story is still being set, in page 10 the
last illustration shows the professor surprised and asking Tin Tin if he likes
bull’s eyes and Tin Tin being surprised by the question, showing a big question
mark above his head. Since that part captured my eyes even thought it was the
end of the page, I wondered how on earth this conversation happened and what
was the relation between the shooting Star and the professor to Tin Tin liking
Bull Eyes; if the shooting star related to the bulls eyes or if the professor
did or if the earth quake mentioned earlier did; and so after creating theories
in my head I went ahead and the previous part to find out how that conversation
happened. I believe that the fact that comic strips have both words and picture
but in a specific set up allow the viewer to move around the page in different
ways creating more interpretations and theories relating it to the previous
knowledge and experience.
On the other hand, the movie medium doesn’t really allow me
to jump around that much and make my own theories, the time in which you
experience the story is already pre determined by the filmmaker, and the viewer
has no way of changing the timing of the story; on the other side, the silent
film, which only consists in imagery and music gives me also more freedom on
the interpretation and the creation of theories.
On the Pay Day short film, when the character comes back to
the house after a long night out, and his wife finds him, we can see an
expression on her face and via body language I can create an interpretation of
what she says grumbling at him, but at the same time I don not know the words
that are being said, I can put the words of my Mum in her mouth, as well as the
words of my professor or my own words, I can also change the way the story is
interpreted.
In this case the lack of words give me freedom of
interpretation of the exact words said in a really relatable way.
As a conclusion I believe that the presence of words and
imagery influences the way we experience and relate to the story. On one hand
the comic book, including imagery and written text, gives me the opportunity to
jump around each act and create my own theories, even thought there is no freedom
of interpretation of what is being said or how it looks I find myself with
wonders that makes me create theories involving myself to the story. And on the
other hand, the silent movies does not have the aspect of free timing between
its parts, but it does have the freedom of what is actually literarily being
said, making it really relatable to my own experience and how things are said, and
also making me wonder what they would have said in the mind of the author.
No comments:
Post a Comment